Archive for June, 2007

Touring houses and Redfin

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Common misconceptions about Redfin and our customers…

Misconception: They all play WoW

Comment on Three Oceans, If You Were Designing The Real Estate Industry From Scratch, Would It Look More Like Coldwell Banker Or Redfin?:

Redfin has a business model that I don’t particularly agree with but I think has a chance at succeeding in their niche- the 1% of buyers/sellers who are WoW (World of Warcraft) webdorks who wear witey tighteys, don’t want to wear shoes, and prefer their translucent skin tone over a tan due to not leaving their house other than mandatory migration to their cubicle at Apple.

I know this realtor’s wife is likely exaggerating but you tell me do any of our California or Washington customers look like they fit that description? Do any of our employees?

Granted… Someone brought in a Wii today and our productivity has plummeted to an all time low as everyone gathers around to play and watch in the conference room.

Misconception: People buy without touring the house

Realtor Wives, Why Redfin Will Succeed

BUT, buyers will never purchase a home sight unseen.

I’ve spoken to a lot of Redfin customers and I don’t know of a single one who has bought a house through Redfin site unseen.

How do Redfin customers see houses?

  • Open houses
  • Touring with the listing agent
  • Touring with a Redfin field agent

Making a case for free meals at work

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Redfin, with our free three lunches a week and liberal snack policy beats Microsoft, but the Google package sounds pretty nice.

From, Life at Google - The Microsoftie Perspective:

If an employee eats an average of $15 of food per day (the actual average at Google which is closer to $10) it would cost Microsoft $3,750 per year per employee to offer 3 meals a day. Instead of increasing starting salaries, switch to free food. Give everyone else half the merit increases we would have gotten AND ANNOUNCE THE FREE FOOD AT THE SAME TIME. For that quoted $10 average Google provides free soda, free organic drinks (odwalla, naked juice), breakfast, lunch, and dinner (most people only eat lunch), free sport drinks (vitamin water, etc.), and free snacks (trail mixes, nuts, chips, candy, gum, cereal, granola bars).

That single benefit gets people to work earlier because hot breakfast is served only until 8:30. And since dinner isn’t served until 6:00 or 6:30 the people with a home-life tend to skip it.

What resonates with me is the idea of using free food to lure employees in earlier and forcing them to stay later.

E-mail vs. email

Friday, June 29th, 2007

We spell e-mail (or is it email?) inconsistently through out Redfin.

I thought it was clear cut since in the past ‘email’ had about 10x the number of hits on Google as ‘e-mail’. However it looks like now they’re about equal but I bet that is because Google normalizes the two to mean the same thing.

We recently debated this and came up with these data points:

  • Wikipedia on it:

    Spelling of this term is disputed, and varies by field. While “e-mail” (with a hyphen) is used in journalism (such as by the CNN, BBC and New York Times), the computer industry primarily uses the spelling “email” (no hyphen).[1] In particular, the original spelling is “email” (no hyphen), based on the technical roots of the term, as seen in the RFC documents for SMTP [4], POP [5] and IMAP [6], which use “mail” or “email”.

  • Wired style: email
  • AP style: e-mail
  • Hotmail: e-mail
  • Google, Yahoo, Mail.com: email

What did we settle on? ‘email’.

WEDJE

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

Mike Davidson, How To Keep Widgets From Slowing Down Sites: WEDJE

Search by town house

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

A comment from a Seattle Sweet Digs post on town homes:


I hate townhomes and I wish I could exclude them from Redfin searches. I hate how hastily they go up and how unimaginative the architecture is. They’re like roaches.

Someone then e-mailed us this comment:

Blog readers hate townhomes too! Matt I’ll bake you cookies if you make it so we can filter out Style==townhome!

To which Glenn, our CEO, replied:

I just bought a townhome.

Why haven’t we added town homes to property types? Unfortunately most MLSes do not have it as a property type. But most have it as a style type. However each represents style differently and so we need to map the values from all the different MLSes we work with to a set of consistent values. Not hard work but not trivial either.

So fitting

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

And then there is Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

What is the right PM:Dev ratio?

Sunday, June 24th, 2007

Dare Obasanjo, What is the Right PM<->Developer Ratio?

Having worked on one consumer facing product where we were 1:1 and now working on another where we’re about 1:4, I have the feeling that the sweet spot is around 1:2. I say this because right now it’s incredibly hard for PM to keep pace with dev and when I was on the 1:1 team I wrote way too many specs that we cut because we didn’t have enough resources.

NWMLS goes green

Sunday, June 24th, 2007

From the Seattle PI’s Building Seattle Green blog comes news that the NWMLS is Going Green!

Effective immediately, listing agents can use checkboxes for highlighting a home’s green and resource-efficient features. Among the new fields are designations for homes that are certified Built Green, ENERGY STAR and LEED and those with third party verification.

I typically spend all day cursing various MLSes for the hoops we have to jump through (for example, you can’t show $/square foot for MLS PIN listings in Boston.) so it’s always nice to read about MLSes doing something right.

Hopefully other MLSes follow suit so that we can add some green search features to Redfin. This also makes me glad that I bought a Built Green condo. Gives it just a little more edge when it comes time to sell.

A rebuttal to: Is Redfin web 2.0?

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

After working long 12+ hour days building www.redfin.com I go home and sit on my couch and have a beer and watch TV for an hour (while e-mailing of course.) I do this to bring my stress level down to something that enables me to get at least a few hours asleep. Unfortunately while on the couch I usually pull up this link: blog search for Redfin.

Most nights I’m able to resist blogging reactions to other’s blog posts on our company but the other night the article that struck a nerve and prevented sleep for a few more hours was this one wondering, Is Redfin.com a True Web2.o Experience? And this sunny Friday afternoon instead of writing up the results from last night’s focus groups I’m going to blog my response.

The post’s argument that we’re not web 2.0 seems to hinge on three points:

  1. We’re not transparent
  2. We don’t give consumers the information to do it themselves
  3. We aren’t a social network

1. Transparency

Well, I would surmise by my own appraisal of Redfin.com that you can easily do more than Redfin is doing, and probably are already. With the transparency debate exposed all over the blogosphere, I look at Redfin and wonder, where exactly is the transparency?

Compared to many other real estate brokerages sites I think Redfin.com is incredibly transparent.

What any 2.o service based industry must provide is information and Redfin offers none.

For as many listings as possible we show the following information accessible to you the consumer 24/7 without ever having to pick up a phone:

  • Sales history
  • Tax information
  • Contact information for listing brokerage
  • Lot outline on the map
  • We’re adding the lot outline to the details page next week
  • Zestimate
  • We show as much information about the listing as allowed by MLS rules
  • Days on Redfin
  • $/square foot
  • E-mail notifications about price reductions, price increases and changes in status

Firstly, I’d love to know what else you’d like for us to display. I know that there are a few more online appraisal sites we could pull estimates from. We could also do a better job by showing the listing’s price history on the details page.

Secondly, are there any ‘Realtor non-2.0′ sites (or otherwise) that come close to showing that level of information for every* MLS listing in the market they serve that we do? (*Redfin does not have land or multi-family listings yet)

Realtor Non-2.o sites in general offer more in their informational teases than you’ll get on Redfin.com.

We also display all this information without requiring registration on Redfin.com (with the exception of the Boston market where we’re required to not show a large amount of information unless you are signed in.) We think we can do a better job of requiring even less registration and in the future we plan on enabling features like saving to favorites and creating saved searches for non-registered users. Hell, Glenn, our CEO, gets upset that we even ask you for your first and last name when you register for an account on Redfin!

And if you do login we do not contact you until you contact us first. We do not cold call or cold e-mail to check up on you and find out how your real estate search process is going.

There’s just no heart or soul on the redfin.com site itself with the only exception being the picture of the random agent on each page.

I agree we can add more heart and soul to some of the About, Buy and Sell pages and we plan to do that with our July/August release by incorporating more photos of Redfin customers and employees. But really we never use stock imagery and with a number of our employees blogging and our corporate blog I think there is a huge amount of heart and soul about Redfin out there on the web. I think you’d be hard pressed to find companies with CEOs willing to disclose as much as ours does.

2. DIY

There must be something more! Click on Buyers and what do you get? Tons of information on how to buy a home? NO! Click on Sellers and you get more of the same nothing-just more clean 2.o white space. It lacks the Why? What? When? How? All of that is missing on Redfin.com; why? They’re not a teaching company, they’re a profit company just like any other major corporation. The only difference being that they aren’t profitable- not in the slightest. What would happen if they actually gave the consumers the transparency they preached? Consumers would actually take the knowledge and cut Redfin.com out all together because Redfin offers the same Where? that most Realtors already offer freely.

Realtor Genius is correct. We’re not a teaching company for DIY-ers. We’re an online real estate brokerage and would love it if you used our services to buy or sell your next home. Yes, we likely could provide more information on how to completely do-it-yourself but we believe that there are still parts of the real estate transaction best handled by a real estate agent. It is for these people that our content is geared towards. (But DIY-ers, we’re not leaving you out to dry and are adding a feature soon which should facilitate conversations between consumers regardless of their stance on representation.)

As the product manager for search at Redfin my focus is on building the best damn search experience whether you use us or not. Every week I field a few calls and e-mails from non-Redfin agents and non-Redfin customers because of an issue with their listing and how it appears on Redfin. Always, we are more than happy to work with them and resolve the issue.

3. Social Networking

Ah yes, social networking:

Unfortunately, there’s nothing really 2.o about redfin.com under the surface- as it completely lacks in the social networking department.

It’s likely no surprise that we’ve talked about the intersection between social networking and Redfin. Most of us here are on LinkedIn, MySpace and Facebook and almost all of us are old enough to remember Friendster. ‘We get web 2.0′ but when making the trade off between building a fast, simple and reliable national online real estate brokerage or adding social networking we’ve chosen the former. Once we’ve got that nailed and see the value in the later we’ll tackle it. In the meantime I’d love to hear your thoughts on the social networking features you’d like to see us add.

Back to the question

Were I to write an article on whether we are web 2.0 site or not I would first define web 2.0 and see how Redfin matches up against the web 2.0 criteria. For that list of criteria I would turn to Wikipedia: web 2.0. I need to get back to work shipping our next release but in short here are some of the web 2.0 criteria I think our website fulfills:

  • Rich internet app: We use Ajax for our map page
  • Mash-up: We combine information from over 50 different data feeds and display it on a map
  • LAMJ stack
  • Weblogs: Corporate blog, employee blogs, with blogs for our major markets

What we could do better:

  • Add RSS to subscribe to a search or changes to your favorites
  • Add tagging of listings
  • Add reviews and ratings of listings (though this is a big can of worms since people will only review homes they don’t want to buy)
  • Add social networking. See what your friends have favorited
  • Clean and meaningful URLs. I hate our current URLs.

How many models does your brokerage have?

Friday, June 22nd, 2007